Monday, May 13, 2013

Binocular Snapshot for 05/13/2013

LastDayWatchers as you watch, remember the May 15th Prophecy pointed out to you on 11/02/2012 via the LOUPE regarding Benghazi and the CIA weasel David Pertrus "all you need to know about the nefarious, extremely wicked; villainous plot; band of thieves; wicked - morally bad in principle or practice of Israel (lost and found)" Therefore read this Recommended Reading
The U.S. effort in Benghazi was at its heart a CIA operation, according to officials briefed on the intelligence. Of the more than 30 American officials evacuated from Benghazi following the deadly assault, only seven worked for the State Department. Nearly all the rest worked for the CIA, under diplomatic cover, which was a principal purpose of the consulate - Doesn't that fact need to be acknowledged if the goal is to figure out what happened?

Mark Steyn's latest National Review piece on Benghazi doesn't mention the CIA. Neither does this Weekly Standard piece, in which Victoria Toensing complains that a recent report about Benghazi "was purposefully incomplete and willfully misleading."
-pr

They wanted to hide the fact that a supposed diplomatic facility was really rife with spies. Why was the compound attacked? It seems likely that the presence of more than 20 CIA agents had something to do with it.

Why were bureaucrats at the State Department so insistent on deflecting blame? Perhaps they're just typically averse to seeing their misjudgments revealed.

It also seems plausible that they conceived of Benghazi as a CIA operation, given the fact that it was largely a CIA operation, and felt the CIA bore responsibility for protecting their own assets

Did an American ambassador die in Benghazi in part because the Obama Administration, like all its executive branch predecessors, decided to use diplomatic cover to protect covert CIA assets?

What, exactly, were those CIA agents doing in Benghazi? These are the sorts of questions neither establishment Republicans nor establishment Democrats have an interest in answering. click to read full article version

"Of course the Republicans don't want to face the fact their hero David Patreus is a lying weasel which is why they still believe in the so-called "Success of the Surge"!

With 100% accuracy written at LastDayWatchers

INFO ON TAP

Iran-backed Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI) especially gained, winning second place with 19 percent of Shiite seats, way up from six percent in 2010 - 2 Shiite factions in power increased their share -- the Fadhila Party, which is nationalist Islamist, and the Badr Organization, which is close to Iran, both of them running inside Maliki's SLC. What they had in common is that both took hard lines on sectarian issues.